As the defending World Champions, ( Wow! What a beautiful phrase.. ) the San Francisco Giants understandably have relatively few unanswered questions heading into the 2013 season. Sure, there's always a spot or two in the bullpen to squabble about, but I'll leave that to smarter authors. For me, once again my baseball universe seems to revolve around the fortunes of Timothy Leroy Lincecum. Big surprise, huh? But seriously, let's face it, the once rock solid, "franchise player" that was Timmeh is a thing of the past. He's a frigging "riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma".
So, let's get to some of those questions. Off the top of my head I can think of 4 or 5...
WHAT WENT WRONG?
Ok, this is not very forward thinking, but sometimes a problem can be identified and fixed. Right? Well, Tim makes this hard. I sure haven't heard him or Righetti or Bochy or anybody really pinpoint a distinct flaw. I guess there was some mention by Tim about his follow through, but it didn't sound very major. Could it explain his terrible fastball control last year? And did he fix it for his post season relief resurgence? We may have to let this question go; however it sure would feel good to place some blame for such a disastrous season (ERA+ of 67 for god's sake!).
DOES THE HAIR CUT REALLY MATTER?
The short answer is, of course, no. But perhaps it is an indication of a new focus or commitment to excellence... nah, the long answer is "no" too.
WHICH TIM SHOWS UP IN 2013? AND DOES IT MATTER THAT MUCH?
Now we are getting to the tough ones. My answer: I can't believe he can be that bad again (he led the league in ER!) so I'm looking for a substantial rebound. I've been burned too bad to really think that Tim will re-climb to the heights of dominance that he once so easily ascended. I'm hoping for about an ERA+ of 120 ( his career average now ) which would probably make him the best #3 starter in the league. Will he matter much? Hell, yea! We proved that we can win the division without him last year ( more like, in spite of him ) but how far do we go in the post season without Tim's contribution last year? Like it or not, Lincecum is a key figure in the NL West race.
And, finally, the BIG question, the elephant in the room type question...
IS 2013 THE END OF TIM"S GIANTS CAREER?
I have said for years that the Giants won't keep three big time starting pitcher contracts, nobody can. Two, sure, but not three. Now I realize that kind of baseball dogma may no longer be true. The Giants have clearly helped establish a new formula for team structure and payroll. Swap that slugger outfielder for a cheaper fast guy and use the money for more pitching. In fact, it could be argued that Tim Lincecum was a big reason for this new thinking; that he was truly a transformative agent. Isn't that worth something? I think so. Which means my answer is NO, this better not be Tim's last season as a Giant. Timmeh has a lot more history to write. Good or bad, he remains one of the most engaging Giants of all time. Matt, MadBum and The Freak all deserve to stay together for a long time to come. And we deserve to see it.
Besides, I hate to mention the obvious ( and disgusting ) destination if Tim does decide to go the free agent route. The filthy rich doggers could pick him up at top dollar rates just to piss us off. That is a future I don't wish to contemplate. Sorry I brought it up.
So, have any questions of your own? Or better yet, answers. It is spring, the time of renewal, so get those brain cells fired up again! The off season is OVER! ( In fact, the first spring training game starts in about a half hour.)
CONGRATULATIONS! You have officially survived another off season. Now write a damn comment!
Saturday, February 23, 2013
Saturday, February 16, 2013
Your 2013 Giants
Post author:
M.C. O'Connor
I'm a thirteen guy. It's my favorite number. I suppose having a favorite number is a little too far along on the nerd spectrum for most folks, but I'm a little too far along on the nerd spectrum to worry about what most folks think. I was born, you see, on a Friday the 13th. Family lore has it that my maternal grandmother (born in the West of Ireland in the early aughts of the previous century) was angry at my mother for not "holding on" for another day. My dear mother, to her credit, was sufficiently modern and American to accept that babies come out when babies come out and was more concerned about me having ten fingers and ten toes than what the nurses would write on the birth certificate. Alas, I was born at 1:54 p.m. (PST), thus falling within the 13th hour. So, like I said before, I'm a thirteen guy. You can imagine, then, my bubbling excitement about the 2013 season for the defending World Champion San Francisco Giants. I'll admit to a still-lingering 2012 party hangover--I've hardly touched the keyboard these last several weeks. After all, you can only write about the joy and giddiness associated with the Giants winning the World Series so many times. Certainly I can obsess over it and revel in it, but communicating my self-indulgent wallowing to my loyal readers here at RMC would be tiresome. And would reveal me to be a silly, shallow, and narcissistic nincompoop. That may indeed already be the case, after all, I'm a grown man and I devote hours of my life to a blog named after my favorite ballplayer.
Mox nox in rem, as Caesar and Cicero would say, or "get on with it, you twit." Yes, 2013 is here. Pitchers and catchers have set up spring shop in the southern desert and the rest of the crew is soon to show. I like this team. I said that this time last season. The Giants have pitching, fielding, hitting, and baserunning. And that other stuff, too. Chemistry. Intangibles. Veteran Savvy Clutchness. Leadership. And don't bet against self-actualized, cosmically aware, and spiritually receptive. Throw in some tabouli and lentil nut loaf on the post-game spread and they'd get a PETA stamp of approval and a rung up on the ladder to heaven. That doesn't get you anywhere in Vegas, however, because the under/over on wins for the club is a mere 86. The moneychangers in Las Temple like the LA Dodgers (90) better, proving once again that Satan has orifices in both cities.
Eighty-six wins? Are you fucking kidding me? The Giants won 86 games in 2011 with Buster Posey's ankle tendons playing hide-the-salami with a demon-possessed Cuisinart. But it's fine, really. It's all good. Let the rabble eat their cake. When Hanley Ramirez jukes like an arthritic water buffalo at balls hit up the middle and Andre Ethier flails like a narcoleptic samurai at pitches from lefties, they'll switch to beach volleyball and UFC throwdowns. OK, to be fair, they've got some talent in the LAtrine. Clayton Kershaw is the best pitcher in the NL. That I'll grant them. And guys like Matt Kemp and Adrian Gonzalez are the real thing. But excuse me for thinking that the Giants are better. It's a team game, y'know. They had all those guys last year and played .500 ball in the last three months of the season. Donnie Baseball didn't exactly dazzle at the helm, and even his bosses have some doubts about him, choosing not to extend his contract. Earvin Moneybags and His High Dollar Homies have publicly declared it's "World Series or Bust" for the blue-clads, and there's nothing like a little pressure added to the mega-media mix that is the City of Angels. If Carl Crawford and Josh Beckett thought that playing in Boston was tough, they are in for a wake-up. Laid-back Californians are just as ruthless as insecure New Englanders when it comes to $200+ million payrolls and dreams of glory. Hollywood has no shortage of buried bodies when it comes to the bottom line.
Since we are on the subject of the bottom line, here's mine: the Giants will win the West. The defending champions are the best team and, if they stay healthy, the rest of baseball will have to go through them if they want the big prize. I'm fresh out of Spring Training stories, I'm afraid, you'll have to go to the Comical Sporting Green for good stuff about Brandon Belt and karaoke. Seriously. That's what the professionals are scribbling about these days. I'm just an amateur hack so I don't have that kind of insight. I'll stick with pitching, fielding, hitting, and baserunning. The Giants did those things in 2012, and will do them again in 2013. And I'll take them over any other club in The Show, thankyouverymuch.
GO GIANTS!
--M.C.
Mox nox in rem, as Caesar and Cicero would say, or "get on with it, you twit." Yes, 2013 is here. Pitchers and catchers have set up spring shop in the southern desert and the rest of the crew is soon to show. I like this team. I said that this time last season. The Giants have pitching, fielding, hitting, and baserunning. And that other stuff, too. Chemistry. Intangibles. Veteran Savvy Clutchness. Leadership. And don't bet against self-actualized, cosmically aware, and spiritually receptive. Throw in some tabouli and lentil nut loaf on the post-game spread and they'd get a PETA stamp of approval and a rung up on the ladder to heaven. That doesn't get you anywhere in Vegas, however, because the under/over on wins for the club is a mere 86. The moneychangers in Las Temple like the LA Dodgers (90) better, proving once again that Satan has orifices in both cities.
Eighty-six wins? Are you fucking kidding me? The Giants won 86 games in 2011 with Buster Posey's ankle tendons playing hide-the-salami with a demon-possessed Cuisinart. But it's fine, really. It's all good. Let the rabble eat their cake. When Hanley Ramirez jukes like an arthritic water buffalo at balls hit up the middle and Andre Ethier flails like a narcoleptic samurai at pitches from lefties, they'll switch to beach volleyball and UFC throwdowns. OK, to be fair, they've got some talent in the LAtrine. Clayton Kershaw is the best pitcher in the NL. That I'll grant them. And guys like Matt Kemp and Adrian Gonzalez are the real thing. But excuse me for thinking that the Giants are better. It's a team game, y'know. They had all those guys last year and played .500 ball in the last three months of the season. Donnie Baseball didn't exactly dazzle at the helm, and even his bosses have some doubts about him, choosing not to extend his contract. Earvin Moneybags and His High Dollar Homies have publicly declared it's "World Series or Bust" for the blue-clads, and there's nothing like a little pressure added to the mega-media mix that is the City of Angels. If Carl Crawford and Josh Beckett thought that playing in Boston was tough, they are in for a wake-up. Laid-back Californians are just as ruthless as insecure New Englanders when it comes to $200+ million payrolls and dreams of glory. Hollywood has no shortage of buried bodies when it comes to the bottom line.
Since we are on the subject of the bottom line, here's mine: the Giants will win the West. The defending champions are the best team and, if they stay healthy, the rest of baseball will have to go through them if they want the big prize. I'm fresh out of Spring Training stories, I'm afraid, you'll have to go to the Comical Sporting Green for good stuff about Brandon Belt and karaoke. Seriously. That's what the professionals are scribbling about these days. I'm just an amateur hack so I don't have that kind of insight. I'll stick with pitching, fielding, hitting, and baserunning. The Giants did those things in 2012, and will do them again in 2013. And I'll take them over any other club in The Show, thankyouverymuch.
GO GIANTS!
--M.C.
Thursday, February 7, 2013
Romo in the Fold
Post author:
Zo
According to Henry Schulman in the Chron today, Sergio Romo has signed a two year contract for $9 million ($3.5/$5.5). Mr. Romo was headed for arbitration, and is the last Giant that is unsigned. That's a good thing. With the addition of Ramon Ramirez, we have a lot of bullpen arms, and it looks like a re-visitation of the closer-by-committee approach. The question is not whether we have a great bullpen, because after all, 2012 World Champions, but is it sufficient going into 2013? My take is that more arms wouldn't hurt. Sergio established himself as an elite reliever this year, but he still has a slight frame and is successful because of a pitch that puts a lot of torque on his elbow. It suggests that Sergio might not be the go-to-closer-guy for the entire season. If Santiago Castilla or some other pitcher can fill in, great, but given the style of team management these days, an every day closer seems preferable. An affordable but incentive laden contract for Brian Wilson would be great, and I'm betting that Brian Sabean has not ruled out bringing in someone else. I want to see Sergio Romo, including all of his fashion sense, his eloquent spokesmanship, and his debris scattering, around for a long time. If that means he doesn't close every day to stay healthy, I'm all for it.
I'm kind of thinking about hitting, too. We obviously had enough hitting last year, and Brandon Belt should be a greater contributor. Pablo Sandoval, too, assuming (hoping) he has a healthy year, should give the Giants more rbi. Buster (the God) Posey should add with a full year. Hopefully, Hunter Pence, also. But our addition this year has been Andres Torres. I like out outfield, and Torres should make a great fourth outfielder, but do we have enough punch? With our pitching staff, maybe so. I hope so. We couldn't stand a 2011-style drop off. Just thinking.
I'm kind of thinking about hitting, too. We obviously had enough hitting last year, and Brandon Belt should be a greater contributor. Pablo Sandoval, too, assuming (hoping) he has a healthy year, should give the Giants more rbi. Buster (the God) Posey should add with a full year. Hopefully, Hunter Pence, also. But our addition this year has been Andres Torres. I like out outfield, and Torres should make a great fourth outfielder, but do we have enough punch? With our pitching staff, maybe so. I hope so. We couldn't stand a 2011-style drop off. Just thinking.
Friday, February 1, 2013
News (Sort Of)
Post author:
Ron
I have a Yoga Student who is friends with one of the Pitching Coaches in the NY Mets Organization. Apparently, his Friend is the guy who watched Brian Wilson work out for them. As has been reported in the media, his Friend (& the Mets) were very unimpressed. Velocity appears to be the big issue.
I, like Lefty Malo, believe that, despite their protestations otherwise, the Giants will find it irresistible to sign Wilson to a small, incentive-rich deal, so that they can continue to market him as he proceeds with what is looking like a very long injury rehab. He may not pitch in 2013, but they'll be able to sell lots of action figures, T-shirts, etc..
I'm OK with that - everyone wins, including those 8-year old Kids with their action figures!
I, like Lefty Malo, believe that, despite their protestations otherwise, the Giants will find it irresistible to sign Wilson to a small, incentive-rich deal, so that they can continue to market him as he proceeds with what is looking like a very long injury rehab. He may not pitch in 2013, but they'll be able to sell lots of action figures, T-shirts, etc..
I'm OK with that - everyone wins, including those 8-year old Kids with their action figures!
Sunday, January 20, 2013
The Trophies, PLURAL!! Part TWO!!
Post author:
JC Parsons
Can't get enough of that shiny stuff? Believe me, brother, I know how you feel. Luckily we have more pictures from the trophy visit last week in Mt. Shasta. It was a grand time for all; "shit-eating" grins were everywhere. Which is as it should be....We are Champions, twice over. I touched them both, just to make sure they were real.
Once again (what an amazing phrase to use in this context) I was struck by the relatively small size of the trophy. I bet Bochy's head weighs more.
That's the new girl, or could you tell? Here they are together, which I guess is how we will always think of them. Unless we get to think of them as a set of three or four...hey! It could happen!
How about some of those S.E.G.'s I mentioned earlier. It was impossible to keep from smiling as soon as we got within 10 miles of the place!
And here is yours truly. I never dreamed this would happen more than once...dare I dream of more?
How about another look? At the trophies, not me! Aren't they the sweetest thangs you ever done seen?
I'm not sure about that snowflake...guess it must have been in the window. Anyway, here's one last view of the girls with the entire crew. See you all next year!
Once again (what an amazing phrase to use in this context) I was struck by the relatively small size of the trophy. I bet Bochy's head weighs more.
How about some of those S.E.G.'s I mentioned earlier. It was impossible to keep from smiling as soon as we got within 10 miles of the place!
And here is yours truly. I never dreamed this would happen more than once...dare I dream of more?
How about another look? At the trophies, not me! Aren't they the sweetest thangs you ever done seen?
I'm not sure about that snowflake...guess it must have been in the window. Anyway, here's one last view of the girls with the entire crew. See you all next year!
Sunday, January 13, 2013
The State of Jefferson Rocks the Trophies!
Post author:
M.C. O'Connor
Lots of locals came to Mt. Shasta City yesterday for the Unveiling and subsequent Viewing. It was party time in the North State, and folks were flashing the colors. I really like the look these two sported (note the winter coats--it was cold):
The Deadheads were out with some spiffy swag:
Me and the Missus got our turn. That's 2010 on the left of the photo, 2012 on the right:
You needed four-wheel drive just to navigate the icy parking lot. Here's us posing with the fancy ride that carried the goods:
I forgave my friend Tom for his ridiculous red coat. After all, the 49ers were hosting a playoff game later in the day (way to go, SF!). I'm telling you, it was cold:
It was a happy crowd (sorry it is a little fuzzy, I'm still getting used to the camera):
And then there's the Man of the Hour, the Administrator of the Mt. Shasta Recreation and Parks District, Mike Rodriguez, who put it all together:
--M.C.
The Deadheads were out with some spiffy swag:
Me and the Missus got our turn. That's 2010 on the left of the photo, 2012 on the right:
You needed four-wheel drive just to navigate the icy parking lot. Here's us posing with the fancy ride that carried the goods:
I forgave my friend Tom for his ridiculous red coat. After all, the 49ers were hosting a playoff game later in the day (way to go, SF!). I'm telling you, it was cold:
It was a happy crowd (sorry it is a little fuzzy, I'm still getting used to the camera):
And then there's the Man of the Hour, the Administrator of the Mt. Shasta Recreation and Parks District, Mike Rodriguez, who put it all together:
GO GIANTS!!
--M.C.
Thursday, January 10, 2013
BBWAA Hall of Fame Votes Itself Into Irrelevancy
Post author:
Zo
This is a rant.
As most everyone knows, the BaseBall Writers Association of America decided that none of the eligible candidates, which included first-time eligible candidates Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens and Curt Shilling, among others, were worthy of induction. Everyone who is NOT in the BBWAA who knows anything about baseball responded with a heart-felt "What the Fuck?"
Yes, you've heard the arguments, and they hinge on the "character" clause, which apparently is interpreted to mean any damn thing the BBWAA voter wants it to mean at that moment. The reason no one, apparently, was inducted into the BBWAA HOF was because of steriods. That has to assume that steriod, or other PED use, was emblematic of insufficient character to warrant induction. It takes, of course, no more than a moment of reflection to realize that this line of reasoning is full of holes.
The use of steriods is cheating. Not always, but at some point the use of steriods and other PED was determined to be illegal under the rules of baseball. So apparently it is the cheating that has been determined to be emblematic of insufficient character. Except that, this doesn't seem to be a very constant point against eligible players. Gaylord Perry was inducted into the HOF in 1991. Mr. Perry was known to have altered the baseball with which he pitched on numerous occasions. That clearly is cheating, but he was elected.
Baseball lore, in fact, love cheating. The game is full of stories about everything from how pitchers doctored baseballs to how players stole signs, to tales of Andre Dawson hiding extra balls in the ivy at Wrigley Field so he could retrieve one if the ball in play bounced into the ivy and he couldn't find it. Andre Dawson was inducted into the HOF in 2010. So it is not really cheating that is the problem, apparently, it is the degree of cheating, or perhaps the type of cheating. But it can't really be the degree of cheating, because no one can tell if PED usage ups your stats, or your competence level, by 5%, 20% or any other number. So the line of reasoning has to be the type of cheating. Use of PED is cheating and this specific type of cheating is an indication of specific character (insufficiency? flaw?) to allow a brilliant player to be inducted into the BBWAA HOF. That is, even if you really knew, which in many cases, you (BBWAA) do not, no matter how much you think you do. That is why they have a court system in this country, so that smart-ass members of the public with half-assed information don't get to arrest, judge and execute people.
Here are some of the types of character flaws that are not considered detrimental to induction in the BBWAA HOF:
wife-beating
unrepentant racism
taking other drugs
cheating except for PED
moral turpitude
wearing a uniform six sizes to big.
So, one thing I noticed is that Craig fucking Biggio got about twice as many votes as Barry Bonds. Is any one of these clowns fucking serious? [here is the part where I drop any pretense of a structured argument and just bitch] I know Mr. Biggio had a long and productive career, and he played several positions, but, REALLY? Wasn't about half his OBP because of uniform shirts HBP? I suggest that the BBWAA just drop the HOF and dedicate the building to themselves. That way, they can put "BaseBall Writers Association of America" in bigger letters, because they have decided to make it about them and their silly, old, white notions of what integrity is all about. They can re-label the part of it that has players in it "Former Baseball Players of Mention, or, at least, that We Like." Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens, just to name two, were among the greatest ballplayers ever, regardless of whether they took PED or had upstanding moral character.
Some of my fellow blog authors may remember one fine day sitting in the Candlestick bleachers as they put up the line score from a Boston-Seattle game. Specifically, it was April 29, 1986. As I recall, the collective sentiment was, "Who the fuck cares about an American league...holy fuck, 20 strikeouts!" Well, then there's this: http://www.mccoveychronicles.com/2013/1/9/3857262/top-5-barry-bonds-home-runs-where-im-picturing-a-writers-head-as-the.
As most everyone knows, the BaseBall Writers Association of America decided that none of the eligible candidates, which included first-time eligible candidates Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens and Curt Shilling, among others, were worthy of induction. Everyone who is NOT in the BBWAA who knows anything about baseball responded with a heart-felt "What the Fuck?"
Yes, you've heard the arguments, and they hinge on the "character" clause, which apparently is interpreted to mean any damn thing the BBWAA voter wants it to mean at that moment. The reason no one, apparently, was inducted into the BBWAA HOF was because of steriods. That has to assume that steriod, or other PED use, was emblematic of insufficient character to warrant induction. It takes, of course, no more than a moment of reflection to realize that this line of reasoning is full of holes.
The use of steriods is cheating. Not always, but at some point the use of steriods and other PED was determined to be illegal under the rules of baseball. So apparently it is the cheating that has been determined to be emblematic of insufficient character. Except that, this doesn't seem to be a very constant point against eligible players. Gaylord Perry was inducted into the HOF in 1991. Mr. Perry was known to have altered the baseball with which he pitched on numerous occasions. That clearly is cheating, but he was elected.
Baseball lore, in fact, love cheating. The game is full of stories about everything from how pitchers doctored baseballs to how players stole signs, to tales of Andre Dawson hiding extra balls in the ivy at Wrigley Field so he could retrieve one if the ball in play bounced into the ivy and he couldn't find it. Andre Dawson was inducted into the HOF in 2010. So it is not really cheating that is the problem, apparently, it is the degree of cheating, or perhaps the type of cheating. But it can't really be the degree of cheating, because no one can tell if PED usage ups your stats, or your competence level, by 5%, 20% or any other number. So the line of reasoning has to be the type of cheating. Use of PED is cheating and this specific type of cheating is an indication of specific character (insufficiency? flaw?) to allow a brilliant player to be inducted into the BBWAA HOF. That is, even if you really knew, which in many cases, you (BBWAA) do not, no matter how much you think you do. That is why they have a court system in this country, so that smart-ass members of the public with half-assed information don't get to arrest, judge and execute people.
Here are some of the types of character flaws that are not considered detrimental to induction in the BBWAA HOF:
wife-beating
unrepentant racism
taking other drugs
cheating except for PED
moral turpitude
wearing a uniform six sizes to big.
So, one thing I noticed is that Craig fucking Biggio got about twice as many votes as Barry Bonds. Is any one of these clowns fucking serious? [here is the part where I drop any pretense of a structured argument and just bitch] I know Mr. Biggio had a long and productive career, and he played several positions, but, REALLY? Wasn't about half his OBP because of uniform shirts HBP? I suggest that the BBWAA just drop the HOF and dedicate the building to themselves. That way, they can put "BaseBall Writers Association of America" in bigger letters, because they have decided to make it about them and their silly, old, white notions of what integrity is all about. They can re-label the part of it that has players in it "Former Baseball Players of Mention, or, at least, that We Like." Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens, just to name two, were among the greatest ballplayers ever, regardless of whether they took PED or had upstanding moral character.
Some of my fellow blog authors may remember one fine day sitting in the Candlestick bleachers as they put up the line score from a Boston-Seattle game. Specifically, it was April 29, 1986. As I recall, the collective sentiment was, "Who the fuck cares about an American league...holy fuck, 20 strikeouts!" Well, then there's this: http://www.mccoveychronicles.com/2013/1/9/3857262/top-5-barry-bonds-home-runs-where-im-picturing-a-writers-head-as-the.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

